Claude Code agent packs, drop-in ready. Start free with the Debug Engineer Pack. Upgrade to the Power Pack when you want the whole lifecycle. Your API key. Zero subscription.
The Claude Code Power Pack is the toolkit I run daily.
MOST POPULAR
16 specialist agents and 11 skills. Drop them in, wire them up, start shipping.
.md files
11 specialist .NET agents — ASP.NET Core, Avalonia, MAUI, EF Core, SQL Server, SQLite, build and release.
/review-cs) — refuses to wave through a red build
7 specialist Python agents — scripting, Anthropic SDK, FastAPI, PyQt6, shared library, Postgres + Redis.
uv, mypy --strict, ruff, pytesthttpx client regeneration
Point it at your diff. Get a commit message and full PR description in seconds.
git diff --staged or your branch diff automaticallypip install from a GitHub release
Two agents and two skills I run on every bug I can't reproduce on the first try. The discipline good engineers apply by hand and most teams skip under pressure: never fix before you've diagnosed, never trust a diagnosis until a devil's advocate has challenged it.
debug-investigator — enumerates every plausible cause, runs read-only verification commands, reports confirmed vs. ruled-out causes with evidence. Does not write the fix.hostile-reviewer — challenges the diagnosis. Causation vs. correlation, coverage gaps, alternative explanations. Returns a clear verdict: Proceed, Proceed with caution, or Do not proceed./webapp-testing — drive the running app with Playwright. Prove the user-facing behavior is fixed, not just the log line./security-review — OWASP Top 10 audit on the diff. Catch the regression the fix introduced before you ship it.
I've used Claude Code daily for months on builtwithclaude.tech. Every agent and skill in these packs is one I open in my own terminal. If an agent didn't pull its weight on a real project, it didn't make the cut.
Pieces of it are. I assembled mine over months, tuning 16 agent files across two live production projects until they earned their place. The Power Pack is that finished setup — every agent, the CLAUDE.md templates, and the guide that wires them together — so you drop in a config that already works instead of rebuilding it repo by repo.
You could, and it'd cost you a month of evenings, not a weekend. $39 is less than an hour of your time. You're buying the months of "why is this agent doing that," already solved.
No. One-time purchase, yours forever. No login, no dashboard, no bill next month.
Any Claude Code project. Drop the .md files into ~/.claude/agents/, pick a CLAUDE.md template, done. Bring your own Claude API key.
It's a one-time download. What you get works the day you buy it and doesn't depend on our uptime. I use these daily, so they track how I actually work. There's no SLA, and the price reflects that.
The free pack is 2 agents and 2 skills, focused on the diagnose-and-verify loop: investigate before you fix, challenge the diagnosis before you trust it, then prove the behavior in a running app and audit the diff for security regressions.
The paid Power Pack is the rest of the toolkit — 16 agents, 11 skills, and 5 CLAUDE.md templates spanning requirements, coding, review, documentation, research, and deployment. The free pack is genuinely useful on its own. If it stops a bug from coming back, the Power Pack is what runs the rest of your day.
7-day money-back guarantee on the Power Pack. Email me, get a refund, keep the files or delete them. No form, no questions.
The free Debug Pack is emailed to you the moment you submit the form. The Power Pack checkout runs through Shopify (they handle payment and tax). The file is emailed to you the moment you pay, usually within a minute.
Two agents and two skills I run on every bug I can't reproduce on the first try. The discipline good engineers apply by hand and most teams skip under pressure: never fix before you've diagnosed, never trust a diagnosis until a devil's advocate has challenged it.
debug-investigator — enumerates every plausible cause, runs read-only verification commands, reports confirmed vs. ruled-out causes with evidence. Does not write the fix.hostile-reviewer — challenges the diagnosis. Causation vs. correlation, coverage gaps, alternative explanations. Returns a clear verdict: Proceed, Proceed with caution, or Do not proceed./webapp-testing — drive the running app with Playwright. Prove the user-facing behavior is fixed, not just the log line./security-review — OWASP Top 10 audit on the diff. Catch the regression the fix introduced before you ship it.